Christo van der Merwe

“Four killed, over a dozen injured in Punjab Cold Storage Blast”

“Four people were killed and as many as 17 others injured as a blast ripped apart and brought down the roof of a cold storage on Friday.” Click here to read the full article Speaking to Christo van der Merwe of MRE, he confirmed that ammonia is explosive at concentrations of between 18 and 26%. However a high temperature flame surge of ±600°C is required to ignite the gas mixture. This could be supplied by  welders, grinders or even boilers. Although its window of ‘danger’ is very small, and Christo estimates that there have been less than 4 ammonia explosions in SA since it was introduced as a refrigerant over 100 years ago, some insurers have picked up on this possible risk. That’s just another reason why companies need to comply with SANS 10147. Christo is now also seeing requirements that electrical power be automatically cut off when the ammonia release is measured at 100 parts per million even though it only becomes explosive  at about 26,000 PPM.   For more information, please contact Christo van der Merwe directly at : 073 308 9150 Email: christo@mre.co.za     [gravityform id=”10″ title=”true” description=”true”]   Read more: Comparing the costs of Freon and Ammonia Refrigeration Systems Read more: GEA Group Engineer, Shaun Kleb, responds to our “Comparing the costs of Freon and Ammonia Refrigeration Systems” (Feb 2016) Article Read more: Do you have a Freon leak? – CALL THE GAS BUSTERS!  

“Four killed, over a dozen injured in Punjab Cold Storage Blast” Read More »

An insightful response to our previous article – “Freezer stores – implication of installing mobiles on the size of the refrigeration plant”

Last month James did an article on whether installing mobile racking in a cold store would increase the operation’s running cost (click here to read). Cape Town based Consulting Engineer at Marine & Refrigeration Engineering (MRE), Christo van der Merwe, had responded:   Freezer Store heat loads The heat load in a freezer store comes chiefly from the following: Heat gain through the walls and ceiling and infiltration through door openings. Heat load from fan motors. Heat load from warm product. Heat load from lights is around 5 to 7% of the total heat load so is largely a minor factor If the lights are switched off when the room is not in use then the effect of lighting is reduced. With mobiles, if only the active aisle lighting is on then lighting heat load is very small.   If mobile racking is installed and the room is the same size but it can hold 80% more pallets then the effect on the heat load is: Heat gain through the walls and the ceiling is the same for the same size of cold store but you can store 80% more product. Heat gain for fans is the same for the same size of cold store but you store 80% more product. Heat gain is the same for warm product if the warm product loading is the same for each scenario. If you load warmer product in a mobile store because you can store more pallets then you will increase the heat load-this is because you have changed something-you have loaded more product.   Conversely, if you have to build a cold store say 60% larger to load the additional 80% of pallets then: The heat load through the walls and ceilings will be higher. The fan heat load will be higher. The refrigeration plant has to have a larger capacity, have a higher first cost and cost more to operate.   So, except for the cost of the mobiles the cold store owner is better off in most other aspects when he installs mobiles.   Other efficiency aspects: Dehumidified airlocks reduce heat load in cold stores and hence the first cost and operating cost of the refrigeration system. Pallet conveyors and high speed doors will reduce heat load and hence first cost and operating cost. LED lighting.   These things are all good ideas and reduce the operating heat load but come at a capital cost.   I would suggest the reason that cold store owners do not go for the more expensive stuff are: It costs more and SA people do not often appreciate the benefits of spending more on upfront costs to save on operational costs. Cold store owners do not always understand the subtle benefits and are probably sceptical of technology. More technology implies higher maintenance costs and employing better trained staff No one company sells a package-we all sell our product for our own benefits.   You need a client who trusts you to be able to sell him more equipment with the intention of reducing his operating costs.   Further comment: If a refrigeration plant is oversized then it should get to temperature quicker and reduce capacity when it gets to temperature and then you will be reducing the electrical costs.   If the plant does not reduce capacity on achieving room temps then the cold store will get colder (which does benefit the product or the cold store owner) but still operates at full electrical cost.   Good old common sense goes a long way to achieving a smarter and more efficient operation and only costs you effort.   For more information contact Christo at Marine & Refrigeration Engineering (MRE), on 27 (0) 21 551 0575 or via email christo@mre.co.za

An insightful response to our previous article – “Freezer stores – implication of installing mobiles on the size of the refrigeration plant” Read More »

Comparing the costs of Freon and Ammonia Refrigeration Systems

Recent discussions with cold store operators around the question, “Given the difference in capital cost why should anyone even look at installing an ammonia as opposed to a Freon refrigeration system?”, prompted me to quiz SARDA’s John Ackermann on the topic. John started by saying that all the chicken abattoirs, Elgin fruit producers most of the big wine producers were using ammonia. He reckons 90 to 95% of current low temperature freezer space in SA is cooled with ammonia. “On a capital cost basis alone, there is no way that an ammonia (R717) system could compete with a Freon one.” Safeties must be considered and coded welders are required for installation and there is always some level of redundancy built in,” he continued. “You could be looking at R3.9M for an ammonia plant when you would pay R2.4M for a Freon equivalent.  “But that’s just the capital cost. You also have to look at the system’s COP”. (co-efficient of performance). “Clients must compare the COPs for the Freon and ammonia alternatives, calculated as the number of kWR of refrigeration obtained per kW hr of electricity used. This will vary by plant but should be available from the suppliers”. “Hard to say what the exact difference will be but not impossible that the COP for an ammonia plant can be close to double that for a Freon equivalent.” In other words, per month, for the life of the store, you could be paying almost twice as much for running a Freon as opposed to an ammonia plant. The energy cost differential increases with the size of the store. According to Christo van der Merwe, of MRE, (Marine and Refrigeration Engineering), Freon systems can be reasonably cost effective up to about 800 pallets. After that, ammonia becomes increasingly attractive. In fact, Christo says, over the life of a refrigeration system, the initial capital cost can represent as little as 10% of the total plant operating cost. The cost and availability of synthetic Freon refrigerants must be considered. They are all imported so the cost will vary with the value of the Rand. While ammonia is imported too, it can also be sourced locally. Ammonia is relatively cheap at approximately R28 per kg in Cape Town. Freon types are priced differently, but you are looking at an average of R120per kg. Freons are also less dense than ammonia, requiring up to double the weight to reach the same volume in litres. Leakages per year should be zero but practically one can budget at about 25 to 30% of charge. Suppliers of refrigeration systems should separate out the cost of a gas charge for their proposed system. This will give you an idea of what you might pay annually in the future. Being odourless, a lot more Freon can be lost before the leak is identified. With ammonia, you know immediately when there is a problem. Environmentally, the COP 21 summit on climate change in Paris advocated a carbon tax. There is also a move afoot to limit the supply of the Freon gases, because of their GWP (global warming potential.) This is likely to increase prices. Ammonia’s global warming potential is zero. The Freons start at a rating of 1800 and go up to over 3000. Any tax (according to John Ackermann it is inevitable in SA ,the draft bill was issued in November 2015, will  be on the basis of TEWI or “total environmental warming impact”, which takes the following into account; COP or Co-efficient of performance. In this instance it is linked to the amount of carbon used to produce a kW of electricity. In SA it is 0.9 kg as we are predominantly coal based electricity producers. Leakage of refrigerant per year. Ammonia is fine as the GWP is zero. But if you have a 25% leakage rate with Freon and it has a GWP of 2100, then the tax will increase, frighteningly……. Finally, ammonia plants with the correct initial design can be expanded cost effectively if the cold store grows. I personally know of one instance where a Freon system was removed when the store was extended and an ammonia plant installed to cover both stores.

Comparing the costs of Freon and Ammonia Refrigeration Systems Read More »